Watching this excellent (I believe amateur) documentary by Thomas J. Falletta about how Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert have affected US politics made me wistful for something similar in the UK. Given the number of clips used in my posts it should come as no surprise that I am an unabashed fan of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. Both shows take an intelligently critical view on political issues and politicians with great wit and with writers and hosts who are clearly well informed.
FAKIN’ IT!: How The Daily Show and The Colbert Report Affect Politics and Policy
Sadly in the UK, since the demise of Spitting Image, we do not have anything that comes close to what TDS and TCR produce 4 nights a week on Comedy Central – a few (Marcus Brigstock, Rory Bremner et al) have tried over the years but ultimately failed to match the quality of their American counterparts. It would not, however, be fair to lay the blame for the UKs inability to produce truly biting and popular political satire on TV at the feet of comedians. British comics have a couple of significant handicaps when it comes to broadcasting.
The first is that we require by law that our TV news is impartial and accurate and have an independent regulator (Ofcom) tasked with ensuring that broadcasters adhere to the law. Section Five of the Communications Act 2003 entitled “Due Impartiality and Due Accuracy and Undue Prominence of Views and Opinions” requires British broadcasters:
- To ensure that news, in whatever form, is reported with due accuracy and presented with due impartiality.
- To ensure that the special impartiality requirements of the Act are complied with.
The fact that we do not allow our TV news to be ‘unfair and unbalanced’ means that Fox News or its equivalent cannot contaminate what is already a polluted pool of news sources. Given the volume of jokes and amusing observations that both Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert make about Fox’s ‘reporting’ that is a problem for British satirists (although I would call it a ‘high quality problem’ and would never want or support a Fox News equivalent in the UK). It is a mystery to me that any so called ‘newspaper’ (see my many references to the opinion sheets known as The Daily Mail, The Sun and The Daily Express elsewhere on this blog) can publish opinions and call them news.
The second issue is that, despite the number of idiotic numpties that sit in both houses of parliament and a veritable ocean of stupid and contemptible announcements made by MPs and Lords on all sides, broadcasters are prevented from showing us our MPs worst bits. British MPs limit the broadcasting of their deliberations by controlling the copyright. This means that they can and do refuse to allow anything that happens in the house to be used for comedic purposes.
No one likes to be laughed at but I would argue that by not allowing us to see our MPs making hypocritical speeches, talking through their hats or simply sleeping on the job they are perverting the electorate’s view of parliament and making us even more suspicious and disconnected from politics. Worse still, they are preventing good comedians from producing high quality and contemporary political satire!
The time for allowing the public to see a warts and all version of what happens in our so called mother of parliaments is long overdue. There should never have been copyright protection for what happens in our parliamentary proceedings. If a politician lies or is constantly changing their publicly expressed views when speaking or voting in the house then the public has every right to be informed and the way to reach most voters is not really through the news it is by humorous berating and general mockery.
In the UK we do now have the 10 O’clock Show, an occasional satirical news program on Channel 4. Fronted by, amongst others, by Charlie Brooker. This is a clip on UK/US News from his BBC Screenwipe show.
Here’s Jon Stewart debating Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly in The Rumble 2012. Find out all you need to know about Bullshit Mountain:
- The sheer scale of child sexual abuse in Britain – reblog of Nick Davies article
- Former Tory minister accused of applying pressure on Simon Danczuk named as Edward Garnier (video)
- A public inquiry into an establishment cover-up of non-recent child abuse is not a “stale ritual” (video)
- Home Office claims that the Leon Brittan paedophile dossier is “lost” are not credible (video)
- Paedophile Neil Wilson’s Suspended Sentence Just Another In An “Endless Catalogue Of Insane Judgements By Male Judges Excusing Men Who Attack Women” (imincorrigible.wordpress.com)
- Cameron’s a congo bongo if he thinks banning words will help to stop child abuse (video)
- The “rank hypocrisy” of political donations (video)
- The facts don’t fit your prejudices? No problem. Be like Fox News and invent your own!
- How the fight against wealth inequality makes 99% of us Nazis
- UKIP Fruit Loops (An Occasional Series): No.2 David Silvester
- Obama: Judge, Jury & Executioner
- The end of net neutrality is why everything that you enjoy on the internet is about to cost you more
- When it comes to cuts, why are welfare benefits for the wealthy different to those for the poor?
- This is how a highly regulated banking system works and it is what global banking should look like
- Capitalism serving God AND Mammon
- Corporations are legally defined as people except when they commit a crime
- Chimps would have been more productive than the 113th do-nothing Congress
- ‘Matt’ from York is Ill Informed and Angry but I Don’t Blame Him I Blame the BBC(imincorrigible.wordpress.com)
- Do you want the truth from your government or just what a minister believes to be true? (Revised and updated) (imincorrigible.wordpress.com)
- Update: Do you want the truth from your government or just what a minister believes to be true? Part 2
- Do you want the truth from your government or just what a minister believes to be true? Part 3
- Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalism
Thank you for your brief guide on regulatory blocks on good political humour.
Surely a huge disclaimer a la South Park, stating ‘this is not a news show, it is satire’ would work.
A question which I cant be bothered to wiki…. I am right in say in that only parliamentary deliberations are copyright?
I came to this because of the big love and tremendous respect I hold for Steward and Colbert, the rays of light in an otherwise really dumb current affairs TV schedule in the State – PBS and NPR and S-Span excepted and distinctly unfunny — Radio 4, BBC and BBC Parliament for the colonials.
Speaking of which you’d never have got the classic White House Correspondents dinner speech Colbert unloaded at an unwitting George W, Bush…. I digress.
What I propose is that by all means necessary we do a like for like exchange for 1 swap of our current affairs and satire artists for 1 year.
Some proposed swaps…
Just on the understanding that we NEVER have to take Pierce Morgan back. You’re welcome America.
Jeremy Paxman/Bill O’reilly – just to show them what quality tv news and opinion looks like.
Steven Colbert – John Steward / Charlie Broker / David Mitchell – It would be a good swap for us both though kudos to John Oliver who did and A1 job….. can we have him back now please America?
What do you think?
An interesting idea! I certainly agree about Colbert’s speech at the WHCD – although Bush and Fox News both found it painfully unamusing as I recall!
America is welcome to keep Piers Morgan until he expires or is charged with phone hacking and we need him back here to appear in court!
Hey, man! Thanks for sharing my video! Really interesting post, too!
It’s a really interesting, well made and enjoyable video – so thank you for putting it together!! I appreciate your kind and generous comment about my post.